Graph Neural Networks for Systemic Risk Detection in Interconnected Financial Markets

Authors

  • Liza Schatteleijn Department of Computer Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA. Author

Keywords:

systemic risk, graph neural networks, financial networks, contagion, supervisory technology, model governance, robustness, financial stability

Abstract

Systemic risk in financial markets arises from the interaction of balance-sheet exposures, market prices, funding conditions, and behavioral responses across institutions and infrastructures. Conventional risk models often treat institutions as independent or rely on aggregate indicators, which limits their capacity to detect contagion pathways that emerge from network structure. This paper examines graph neural networks as a computational and institutional architecture for systemic risk detection in interconnected financial markets. It argues that graph learning is valuable not merely because it can model relational data, but because it can support supervisory workflows that require temporal awareness, interpretability, robustness, and cross-border coordination. The discussion situates graph neural networks within a broader socio-technical system that includes data governance, model validation, regulatory reporting, cloud and high-performance computing infrastructure, and policy accountability. The paper analyzes architectural trade-offs among graph convolutional, attention-based, and inductive message-passing designs, and it considers how these models handle heterogeneous exposures, regime shifts, missing data, and adversarial manipulation. It further explores evaluation criteria beyond predictive accuracy, including stability under stress, fairness across jurisdictions and institution types, and sustainability in deployment. The paper concludes that graph neural networks can improve systemic risk detection when embedded in a governance framework that treats models as supervisory instruments rather than autonomous decision-makers. The central challenge is therefore not only technical performance but the design of trustworthy, auditable, and adaptable infrastructures capable of detecting financial fragility without amplifying it.

References

1. Battiston, S., Farmer, J. D., Flache, A., Garlaschelli, D., Haldane, A. G., Heesterbeek, H., Hommes, C., Jaeger, C., May, R. M., & Scheffer, M. (2016). Complexity theory and financial regulation. Science, 351(6275), 818–819. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad0299

2. Haldane, A. G., & May, R. M. (2011). Systemic risk in banking ecosystems. Nature, 469(7330), 351–355. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09659

3. Acemoglu, D., Ozdaglar, A., & Tahbaz-Salehi, A. (2015). Systemic risk and stability in financial networks. American Economic Review, 105(2), 564–608. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20130456

4. Gai, P., & Kapadia, S. (2010). Contagion in financial networks. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 466(2120), 2401–2423. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2009.0410

5. Billio, M., Getmansky, M., Lo, A. W., & Pelizzon, L. (2012). Econometric measures of connectedness and systemic risk in the finance and insurance sectors. Journal of Financial Economics, 104(3), 535–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.12.010

6. Kipf, T. N., & Welling, M. (2017). Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. International Conference on Learning Representations. https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.02907

7. Veličković, P., Cucurull, G., Casanova, A., Romero, A., Liò, P., & Bengio, Y. (2018). Graph attention networks. International Conference on Learning Representations. https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.10903

8. Hamilton, W. L., Ying, R., & Leskovec, J. (2017). Inductive representation learning on large graphs. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 1024–1034. https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.02216

9. Liu, T. (2026). Trust-Calibrated Multi-Agent Decision Intelligence for Financial Risk Management under Market Regime Shifts. Available at SSRN 7307503.

10. Diebold, F. X., & Yılmaz, K. (2014). On the network topology of variance decompositions: Measuring the connectedness of financial firms. Journal of Econometrics, 182(1), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2014.04.012

11. Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439), 509–512. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5439.509

12. Gai, P., Haldane, A., & Kapadia, S. (2011). Complexity, concentration and contagion. Journal of Monetary Economics, 58(5), 453–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2011.05.005

13. Brunnermeier, M. K. (2009). Deciphering the liquidity and credit crunch 2007-2008. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(1), 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.23.1.77

14. Cont, R., Moussa, A., & Santos, E. B. (2013). Network structure and systemic risk in banking systems. In J.-P. Fouque & J. A. Langsam (Eds.), Handbook on systemic risk (pp. 327–368). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139151184.018

15. International Monetary Fund. (2020). Global financial stability report: Markets in the time of COVID-19. International Monetary Fund.

16. Arora, S., Barak, B., Brunnermeier, M., & Ge, R. (2011). Computational complexity and information asymmetry in financial products. Communications of the ACM, 54(5), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1145/1941487.1941512

17. Tetlock, P. C. (2007). Giving content to investor sentiment: The role of media in the stock market. Journal of Finance, 62(3), 1139–1168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01232.x

18. Goodfellow, I. J., Shlens, J., & Szegedy, C. (2015). Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples. International Conference on Learning Representations. https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6572

19. Rudin, C. (2019). Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(5), 206–215. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x

20. Financial Stability Board. (2017). Artificial intelligence and machine learning in financial services: Market developments and financial stability implications. Financial Stability Board.

21. Bank for International Settlements. (2021). Annual economic report 2021. Bank for International Settlements.

22. Xu, K., Hu, W., Leskovec, J., & Jegelka, S. (2019). How powerful are graph neural networks? International Conference on Learning Representations. https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.00826

Downloads

Published

2026-09-07