Temporal Graph Learning for Contagion Risk Detection in Financial Networks

Authors

  • Ewelina Szeja Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA. Author
  • Zehaan Wagle Department of Computer Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA. Author
  • Venancio Ceci Department of Computer Science, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA. Author

Keywords:

temporal graph learning, financial contagion, systemic risk, graph neural networks, financial supervision, model governance, systemic resilience

Abstract

Financial contagion is no longer adequately understood as a static property of balance-sheet exposure or a periodic stress-test outcome. It emerges from evolving relationships among banks, non-bank financial institutions, markets, payment systems, collateral networks, and cross-border funding channels. This paper examines temporal graph learning as a system-level capability for detecting contagion risk in financial networks. Rather than treating machine learning as a narrow predictive layer, the discussion positions temporal graph architectures within a broader socio-technical infrastructure involving data engineering, supervisory governance, model validation, privacy controls, operational resilience, and policy accountability. The paper first reviews classical network theories of financial contagion and their limits under regime shifts, liquidity spirals, and multiplex interdependence. It then analyzes temporal graph neural architectures, including memory-based, attention-based, and evolving convolution approaches, as mechanisms for representing dynamic exposure, latent channels, and time-varying centrality. The paper argues that detection quality depends less on any single model than on the institutional capacity to integrate heterogeneous data, calibrate trust across agents, preserve interpretability, and manage false positives during crises. It further considers fairness, robustness, and sustainability challenges, especially when models trained on stable periods are deployed during market dislocations. Policy implications include supervisory sandboxes, model risk standards, audit trails, and cross-border information-sharing arrangements. The conclusion emphasizes that contagion risk detection should be designed as a resilient public-private infrastructure rather than a proprietary alert system.

References

1. Allen, F., & Gale, D. (2000). Financial contagion. Journal of Political Economy, 108(1), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1086/262109

2. Haldane, A. G., & May, R. M. (2011). Systemic risk in banking ecosystems. Nature, 469(7330), 351-355. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09659

3. Gai, P., & Kapadia, S. (2010). Contagion in financial networks. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 466(2120), 2401-2423. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2009.0410

4. Acemoglu, D., Ozdaglar, A., & Tahbaz-Salehi, A. (2015). Systemic risk and stability in financial networks. American Economic Review, 105(2), 564-608. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20130456

5. Battiston, S., Puliga, M., Kaushik, R., Tasca, P., & Caldarelli, G. (2012). DebtRank: Too central to fail? Financial networks, the FED and systemic risk. Scientific Reports, 2, 541. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00541

6. Billio, M., Getmansky, M., Lo, A. W., & Pelizzon, L. (2012). Econometric measures of connectedness and systemic risk in the finance and insurance sectors. Journal of Financial Economics, 104(3), 535-559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.12.010

7. Diebold, F. X., & Yilmaz, K. (2014). On the network topology of variance decompositions: Measuring the connectedness of financial firms. Journal of Econometrics, 182(1), 119-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2014.04.012

8. Barabasi, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439), 509-512. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5439.509

9. Kipf, T. N., & Welling, M. (2017). Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations.

10. Hamilton, W. L., Ying, R., & Leskovec, J. (2017). Inductive representation learning on large graphs. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 1024-1034).

11. Velickovic, P., Cucurull, G., Casanova, A., Romero, A., Lio, P., & Bengio, Y. (2018). Graph attention networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations.

12. Xu, D., Ruan, C., Korpeoglu, E., Kumar, S., & Achan, K. (2020). Inductive representation learning on temporal graphs. In International Conference on Learning Representations.

13. Pareja, A., Domeniconi, G., Chen, J., Ma, T., Suzumura, T., Kanezashi, H., Kaler, T., Schardl, T., & Leiserson, C. (2020). EvolveGCN: Evolving graph convolutional networks for dynamic graphs. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 34, pp. 5363-5370). https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v34i04.5984

14. Rossi, E., Chamberlain, B., Frasca, F., Eynard, D., Monti, F., & Bronstein, M. (2020). Temporal graph networks for deep learning on dynamic graphs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.10637.

15. Trivedi, R., Farajtabar, M., Biswal, P., & Zha, H. (2019). DyRep: Learning representations over dynamic graphs. In International Conference on Learning Representations.

16. Kazemi, S. M., Goel, R., Jain, K., Kobyzev, I., Sethi, A., Forsyth, P., & Poupart, P. (2020). Representation learning for dynamic graphs: A survey. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 21(70), 1-73.

17. Khandani, A. E., Kim, A. J., & Lo, A. W. (2010). Consumer credit-risk models via machine-learning algorithms. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(11), 2767-2787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.06.001

18. Liu, T. (2026). Trust-Calibrated Multi-Agent Decision Intelligence for Financial Risk Management under Market Regime Shifts. Available at SSRN 7307503.

19. Financial Stability Board. (2020). The use of supervisory and regulatory technology by authorities and regulated institutions: Market developments and financial stability implications. Financial Stability Board.

20. European Central Bank. (2021). Financial stability review. European Central Bank.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-04